US President Donald Trump has announced his intention to designate the Strait of Hormuz as American territory. This provocative move comes as the Iranian government rejects the claim, asserting that Tehran will not be intimidated by Washington's threats.

Advertisement

The US Blockade and Trump's Bid to Annex the Strait of Hormuz

President Donald Trump has asserted that the United States will soon declare the Strait of Hormuz—the critical waterway separating Oman and Iran—as US territory. According to the report, Trump stated that the US blockade of this strategic route remains activve, insisting that no vessels may pass through the strait without explicit American permission.

This territorial claim is tied to a broader strategy regarding Iran's nuclear ambitions. President Donald Trump argued that American citizens should be prepared to endure higher gas prices as a necessary cost to ensure that a "very evil country" is prevented from acquiring a nuclear weapon.. This framing suggests that the US administration views the control of the Strait of Hormuz not just as a military objective, but as a primary lever of economic warfare.

Kpler Data and the 80% Drop in Vessel Traffic

The economic impact of the ongoing conflict is already evident in shipping volumes. As of August 12, data from the shipping analytics firm Kpler,cited by CNN, reveals that only 3,371 vessels have crossed the Strait of Hormuz in the 166 days since the war began. This represents only about 20 percent of the traffic volumes seen before the conflict erupted.

The drastic reduction in maritime activity underscores the volatility of the reion. Because the Strait of Hormuz links the Gulf to the Arabian Sea and the Gulf of Oman, any permanent US annexation or prolonged blockade threatens the stability of global energy supplies. The current 80 percent decline in traffic suggests that the waterway is already functioning as a contested zone rather than a free international passage.

From the June 17 Deal to July's Strikes in Jordan and Bahrain

The current escalation follows a failed attempt at diplomacy. The US and Iran initially agreed to a ceasefire brokered by Pakistan in April, which led to a formal deal signed on June 17. However, as the report says, these negotiations eventually stalled due to fundamental disagreements over freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and necessary security guarantees.

The collapse of the June 17 agreement triggered a surge in military aggression. Between July 8 and July 24, the US and Iran engaged in a series of reciprocal strikes. Washington launched attacks directly inside Iranian borders, while Tehran responded by targeting US military equipment and facilities located in several Arab nations, specifically Jordan, Bahrain, and Kuwait.

The 250-Day Deployment of the USS Lincoln

The prolonged conflict is placing an unprecedented strain on American military personnel. President Donald Trump recently confirmed that the USS Lincoln is being replaced after a record-breaking 250-day deployment. This extended tour of duty highlights the logistical challenges of maintaining a permanent blockade and a territorial presence in the Persian Gulf.

While the administration has dismissed concerns regarding the length of the USS Lincoln's deployment, the operational toll on the US military is mounting.. The need for such extended deployments suggests that the US is struggling to rotate forces quickly enough to sustain the high-pressure environment required to enforce a blockade against Iranian opposition.

Whether Pakistan and Qatar Can Restart Stalled Talks

Despite the rhetoric of annexation, a critical question remains: can the diplomatic channels involving Pakistan and Qatar be reopened? Iranian officials have explicitly stated that their current contacts with these two nations should not be interpreted as a willingness to return to direct negotiations with the United States.

Furthermore , the report leaves several points unverified, including the specific legal mechanism the US would use to "declare" an international strait as its own territory. While Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi has called the US claims "baseless lies," it remains unclear if Tehran is open to any third-party mediation that does not involve a total US withdrawal from the waterway.