A church minister, Joseph Cherian, avoided a six-month driving ban after successfully arguing that his congregation would suffer exceptional hardship if he lost his ability to drive. Cherian, who oversees 13 Pentecostal churches across northern England and Wales, was caught using his mobile phone while driving, which added six points to his license, bringing his total to 12 points.

Pastor Cherian's 60 ,000-Mile Annual Commute

Cherian, better known as Pastor Biju Cherian, argued that he drives approximately 5,000 miles each month, totaling around 60,000 miles annually. his lawyer, Gwyn Lewis, pointed out that it is 'extremely difficult' to drive such a distance without accumulating any points on one's license. Cherian claimed that public transport was not a viable alternative, especially in crisis moments when his congregation needed him quickly.

The Congregation's Dependence on Cherian's Mobility

Cherian's argument centered on the idea that his churches would 'not effectively be able to function' without his ability to visit them.. He stated that he is the only official who can lead communion, baptisms, weddings, and funerals at these churches. Additionally, he provides personal counseling, family counseling, hospital visits, and child dedications. Some churches, such as those in Ludlow and Bangor, would 'definitely need to close' if he were banned from driving, as he cannot rely on public transport.

Legal Outcome and Financial Penalties

The magistrates at a court in Chester accepted Cherian's case and allowed him to continue drviing despite having 12 points on his license. However, he was fined £492 and ordered to pay £327 in costs and a surcharge. Judge Ian Williams acknowledged Cherian's role in his congregation and the needs he fulfills, stating that the people are 'eternally grateful' for his services.

Unanswered Questions About Cherian's Driving Record

While the court accepted Cherian's argument , several questions remain unanswered. It is unclear how Cherian incurred the other six points on his license . Additionally, the specifics of the 'crisis moments' that require his immediate presence are not detailed. The case raises questions about the balance between personal responsibility and the needs of a community.