Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is slated for a royal ceremonial funeral despite the loss of his official titles. Government sources indicate he remains on a secret list for high-profile services.
The Cabinet Office's 'bridge' plans for Mountbatten-Windsor
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor remains eligible for a royal funeral under secret government "bridge" plans . these meticulous arrangements , according to the report, ensure that specific members of the Royal Family receive high-profile services regardless of their current standing. While the 66-year-old Mountbatten-Windsor is currently in good health, the Cabinet Office continues to oversee and review these plans.
The proposed venue for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's service is believed by royal experts to be St George's Chapel in Windsor Castle. This 14th-century site has hosted the funerals of both Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip, as well as the 2018 wedding of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.
A Frogmore burial echoing Edward VIII's 1936 disgrace
Burial for Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor would likely occur at the 33-acre Royal Burial Ground at Frogmore in Home Park, Windsor. This location provides a historical parallel to King Edward VIII , who abdicated the throne in 1936 to marry Wallis Simpson and was subsequently buried at Frogmore in disgrace. this pattern suggests that the British state often separates ceremonial burial rights from the personal or political failures of the individual.
By placing Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor in the same cemetery as a disgraced former monarch, the "bridge" plans maintain a tradition of royal exclusivity that persists even after a member has been cast out of public life. This ensures that the physical remains of the dynasty are kept within private royal grounds, regardless of the individual's reputation.
Gloria Allred and Alicia Kearns challenge the taxpayer burden
The prospect of a royal send-off has drawn sharp criticism from legal and political figures.. US lawyer Gloria Allred, representing 27 victims of Jeffrey Epstein, questioned why Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor should be afforded such an honor given his ties to the financier. Similarly, Tory shadow Home Office minister Alicia Kearns argued that the plans should be revoked immediately, stating there are no circumstances under which the former royal deserves such a ceremony.
Financial concerns also underpin the backlash, as former government minister Norman Baker claimed that Mountbatten-Windsor is now a "commoner" and should not receive state-funded honors. As the report notes, critics like Gloria Allred are specifically questioning why UK taxpayers should bear the financial burden of Mountbatten-Windsor's expenses, whether in life or after death.
The disconnect between King Charles's title strip and ceremonial honors
The continued existence of these funeral plans highlights a gap in the disciplinary measures taken by the monarchy. In November last year, King Charles stripped his brother of his HRH style and prince title in a move that effectively turned Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor into a private citizen. However, the "bridge" plans suggest that while the titles are gone,the ceremonial status remains intact.
Several critical details regarding these arrangements remain obscured. It is currently unknown exactly how the Cabinet Office has revised the plans since the title strip, or if the "secret list" is subject to a formal appeal process. Furthermore, the government has not clarified if King Charles himeslf has the final authority to strike a name from the bridge plans, or if these are fixed state protocols that override the monarch's personal wishes.
Comments 0