Quebec's provincial election on October 5 has transformed into a volatile contest following the breakdown of trade negotiations between Canada and the United States. Christine Fréchette's Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ) is seeing a surge in support, while the Parti Québécois (PQ) has been forced to suspend its plans for an independence referendum.

Advertisement

The $10 billion federal bridge to Christine Fréchette

The current political climate in Quebec marks a sharp departure from the era of former Premier François Legault, who frequently clashed with Ottawa over judicial appointments and immigration. According to the report, Christine Fréchette has instead cultivated a constructive alliance with Prime Minister Mark Carney, positioning the CAQ as a pragmatic partner during a period of international economic instability.

This cooperative strategy has already yielded tangible results for the province. The report notes that federal commitments include nearly $10 billion in infrastructure transfers, an $11 billion contract for the Davie shipyard to construct six icebreakers, and federal loan guarantees for a $30 billion hydro project in Labrador managed by Hydro-Québec. By aligning with Mark Carney, Christine Fréchette is presenting the CAQ as the only party capable of securing federal resources while shielding Quebec from external shocks.

Why the Parti Québécois shelved its referendum until Trump departs

For nearly three years, the Parti Québécois (PQ) appeared to be the dominant force in the race, leveraging a promise of a third sovereignty referendum to lead the polls. However, the collapse of trade talks with the administration of Donald Trump has shifted the electorate's focus from constitutional identity to economic survival.. Consequently, PQ leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon has shelved the referendum plan until Donald Trump is no longer in office.

The economic anxiety triggered by the trade war has eroded the PQ's perceived inevitability. While the Parti Québécois still leads the CAQ by eight percentage points among francophone voters, the party is now searching for a "Plan B" as the risk of punitive U.S. levies grows. Paul St-Pierre Plamondon argues that a PQ government would be better equipped to defend Quebec's interests in trade negotiations,but the immediate fear of tariffs has dampened the appetite for a separatist break.

The 10 per cent floor for Charles Milliard's Liberals

The Quebec Liberal Party (QLP) is facing a crisis of identity and support among French-speaking voters. A Léger survey cited in the report places leader Charles Milliard at just 10 per cent support among francophones, trailing not only the CAQ and PQ but also the Quebec Conservative Party, which sits at 16 per cent. This decline suggests that the QLP is losing its traditional status as the default vehicle for francophone federalists.

Charles Milliard's struggle is compounded by a difficult inheritance;he took over the leadership in February after Pablo Rodriguez resigned following a scandal involving 2025 leadership campaign financing. Milliard's perceived indecision regarding the use of the notwithstanding clause to protect language laws has further alienated voters, leaving the QLP dominant only among anglophones and risking a total shutout in francophone-heavy districts.

Did Mark Carney manufacture a French language fight?

A central point of contention in the race is whether the Canadian government used cultural identity as a geopolitical shield. The U.S. commerce secretary has explicitly accused Prime Minister Mark Carney of fabricating a conflict over the French language specifically to prevent the sovereigntists of the Parti Québécois from winning the provincial election.

There remain several unverified claims regarding the actual demands of U.S. negotiators. While Mark Carney claims that Washington sought concessions on digital content rules and bilingual labeling, Paul St-Pierre Plamondon and members of Donald Trump's inner circle have cast doubt on these assertions. It remains unclear if the trade breakdown was a genuine clash of policy or a calculated political maneuver by Ottawa to stabilize Quebec's provincial politics before the October 5 vote.