The 1984 Act: A Turning Point in British Policing

The Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984 marked a significant shift in British policing, treating officers as untrustworthy and burdening them with codes of practice. This move, as reported by the source, led to officers being moved from streets to cars and offices in a failed efficiency drive, making policing sedentary. The push for female recruitment and abolition of height requirements in 1990 further prioritized gender over merit, as noted by the author.

The once-conservative force, composed of traditionally minded men patrolling on foot, was systematically dismantled. The rank of WPC was abandoned in 1999, and liberal graduates like Cressida Dick rose through the ranks.. In 1994, uniforms changed from traditional tunics and helmets to pseudo-military gear with duty belts, flat caps, and high-visibility jackets, later replaced by baseball caps.

A Shift in Policing Ideology

The 2002 alteration of the police oath replaced the pledge to serve the Queen and uphold law without favor or ill-will with a promise to uphold Human Rights, including fairness, integrity, and equal respect. This marked the open shift to two-tier policing, a term now used but misleading. everyone receives the same pitiful service, except when scandal or disorder forces officers from their offices or cars.

The 1999 Macpherson inquiry dealt a devastating blow to wise policing. The case of Henry Nowak exemplifies the crisis: an officer disrespectfully dismissed a dying man's plea. Stabbings are common because police fail to prevent crime, especially drug-related offenses. They cannot undo crimes; arriving afterwards is futile.

The Consequences of Reactive Policing

Firefighters extinguish fires,paramedics save lives, but police after a crime only take notes and issue crime numbers. This reactive policing is worse than useless when Marxoid 1960s dogmas blind them to reality, making them see things that are not there. The laws of England, no longer based on Christianity and monarchy, now reflect a politically correct People's Republic.

To be properly policed, we must rebuild a force like the old one, sacking these useless paramilitary social workers.. The author argues that this is the only way to achieve proper policing, dismissing the current system as ineffective and biased.

Open Questions

Who is responsible for the decline of British policing? Is it the politicians, the police leadership, or the ideological shift that has taken place? The source raises more questions than it answers, leaving the reader to ponder the complexities of the issue.

What can be done to rebuild a force like the old one? Is it possible to go back to a more traditional approach to policing, or is it too late? The author's call to action is clear, but the path forward is uncertain.