A recent Thrivent survey indicates that almost 50% of non-retirees doubt they will ever stop working entirely. This skepticism is driven by a combination of economic instability and the potential disruption caused by artificial intelligence.
The 47% skepticism gap in American retirement planning
The Thrivent 2026 Retirement Expectations Survey reveals a growing disconnect between traditional retirement goals and modern economic realities. while 58 percent of non-retirees remain confident they can exit their primary careers on schedule, a staggering 47 percent doubt they will ever be able to stop working entirely. As reported by Newsweek,this skepticism is fueled by the dual pressures of persistent inflation and the rising cost of housing. This shift suggests that the traditional milestone of mid-60s retirement is being replaced by a more fluid, and often more precarious, professional timeline.
Drew Powers, founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, noted that while medical advances might allow office workers to work longer,the disappearance of the middle class is simultaneously eroding the dream of a comfortable retirement. The economic environment is forcing a rethink of what it means to successfully exit the labor force.
Gen Z and Millennials lead the fear of AI-driven job losses
Artificial intelligence is no longer a distant threat but a primary driver of retirement anxiety for younger workers. According to the Thrivent data, 63 percent of Gen Z and 59 percent of Millennials fear that AI-related job reductions will undermine their ability to save for the long term. This anxiety is particularly acute compared to Gen X and Baby Boomers, where only 49 percent shared these concerns. The data suggests that the digital revolution is fundamentally altering the psychological contract between workers and their long-term financial secuirty.
Thrivent financial adviser Jason Rogoff noted that Americans are navigating a much wider range of economic uncertainties than in previous years. This trend is already being felt by those currently in retirement,with 30 percent of retirees reporting that AI-related workforce shifts have negatively impacted them, up from 20 percent just one year ago .
Moving from "full retirement" to Michael Ryan's "reduce and delay" model
The definition of retirement is shifting from a complete exit to what finance expert Michael Ryan calls a "reduce and delay" model.. Rather than a sudden cessation of labor, many Americans are planning for a gradual transition into consulting or part-time roles. This pragmatic approach is born of necessity, as 64 percent of survey respondents stated they are currently more focused on their immediate financial situation than on long-term retirement planning.
Michael Ryan of MichaelRyanMoney.com pointed out that many workers have already been forced to reduce or stop retirement savings in the last six months, with half of all workers even dipping into existing savings just to cover current expenses.. For these individuals, retirement is not being abandoned , but rather redefined as a period of continued, albeit lessened, professional engagement.
Kevin Thompson’s warning on AI and Social Security funding
The potential for widespread automation creates a looming crisis for the funding of Social Security and Medicare. Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group, warned that if AI replaces the human workers who currently fund these programs through payroll taxes, the entire system may require a fundamental redesign. This leaves several critical questions for policymakers: Will the government implement a "machine tax" to offset lost payroll revenue, or will the tax code require a complete overhaul to maintain these social safety nets? Furthermore, it remains unclear how Congress will balance these structural shifts against the immediate needs of an aging population.
Comments 0