A federal judge has thrown out a trademark lawsuit filed by Lost Surfboards against Lady Gaga. The company claimed the singer's "Mayhem" album name infringed on its brand, but the court ruled the title is protected artistic expression.
Judge Olguin and the First Amendment shield for "Mayhem"
In a decision delivered on Tuesday, August 18, Judge Olguin ruled that the use of the word "Mayhem" for Lady Gaga's latest album does not violate trademark law. according to reporting from Billboard, the judge determined that the album is an expressive work protected by the First Amendment, meaning the singer is free to use the term unless it was intentionally designed to dceeive the public.
The court found that Lost Surfboards failed to provide evidence that consumers were actually misled into thinking the music was connected to the surfing brand. Judge Olguin noted in a decision obtained by Bloomberg Law that the allegations made by the surfboard company were "conclusory and insufficient" to prove that Lady Gaga, born Stefani Germanotta, attempted to misrepresent the source of her work.
From "Barbie Girl" to the Rogers test: A history of artistic trademarks
The dismissal of the case against Lady Gaga relies on a long-standing legal precedent known as the Rogers test. This standard, which originated from a case involving Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, establishes that trademark owners cannot police the use of their names in creative works—such as books, movies, or songs—unless the use is completely irrelevant to the art or explicitly misleading.
This legal framework has historically protected artists from corporate overreach. a prominent example cited in the case is the 2002 federal appeals court ruling that dismissed a lawsuit by Barbie maker Mattel against the group Aqua over their hit song "Barbie Girl." By applying the same logic to Lady Gaga's "Mayhem," the court reaffirmed that the First Amendment generally outweighs a brand's desire to control a common dictionary word when used in a creative context.
Lost Surfboards' claim over a red logo and a 1980s brand
Lost Surfboards initiated the lawsuit last year, arguing that Lady Gaga showed a "blatant disregard" for trademark rights the company has held since the 1980s. The surfboard company claimed that the "Mayhem" brand was not only a name but a visual identity, alleging that the album and its accompanying merchandise featured a stylized red logo that closely mirrored the one used on their surfboards.
Lawyers for Lost Surfboards argued that the pop star unilaterally misappropriated the name without permission. however, Lady Gaga's legal team countered that the lawsuit was a "transparent attempt" to gain pulicity and financial leverage from one of the world's most famous artists. They pointed out that despite significant record sales and touring, the plaintiff could not identify a single person who mistakenly believed the album was associated with surfing equipment.
Will Lost Surfboards appeal the lack of "confused consumers"?
While the current ruling is a total victory for Lady Gaga, the legal battle is not necessarily over. Lost Surfboards retains the right to appeal Judge Olguin's decision to a federal appeals court. This follows an earlier setback for the company in April, when the same judge refused to grant an injunction that would have barred Lady Gaga from using the "Mayhem" name while the case proceeded.
The central tension remains whether a stylized logo can cross the line from "expressive use" to "consumer confusion." Because neither Lady Gaga nor Lost Surfboards has issued a formal comment following the Tuesday ruling, it remains unclear if the surfboard company will pursue a higher court or accept the judge's finding that an album name is unlikely to be mistaken for a product endorsement.
Comments 0