A high-level Hamas delegation, headed by Khalil al-Hayya, arrived in Cairo on Sunday to meet with Egyptian intelligence chief Hassan Rashad. The talks centered on the implementation of the Gaza ceasefire agreement and regional political developments.

Advertisement

Khalil al-Hayya and Hassan Rashad’s Cairo Summit

The meeting between Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya and Egyptian intelligence chief Hassan Rashad represents a critical attempt to stabilize the current ceasefire. According to the report, the Hamas delegation used the session to brief Egyptian mediators on what they characterize as ongoing Israeli violations of the peace terms.. Hamas expressed gratitude for Egypt's role in consolidating the truce, signaling that Cairo remains the indispensable bridge between the warring parties.

Beyond the immediate ceasefire, the discussions touched upon the broader political landscape of the occupied West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The Hamas delegation emphasized its commitment to a plan proposed by Donald Trump, specifically regarding the alleviation of humanitarian suffering and the commencement of reconstruction efforts within the enclave.

The 1,260 casualties reported since the October 2025 truce

While diplomats meet in Cairo, the data from the Gaza Health Ministry suggests the ceasefire is failing to protect civilians. As the source noted, despite a truce that has been nominally in place since October 2025, the Israeli army has continued operations that have resulted in at least 1,260 deaths and over 4,100 injuries.

This pattern of violence echoes the broader devastation seen since October 2023, when the Israeli army launched an offensive that has claimed over 73,000 lives and wounded more than 174,000 people. The persistence of strikes during a declared truce indicates a systemic failure in the enforcement mechanisms of the current agreement, turning the "ceasefire" into a period of reduced, rather than eliminated, combat.

Jared Kushner’s diplomatic mission to New Alamein

Simultaneous to the Hamas talks, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi met with Jared Kushner,the son-in-law and adviser to Donald Trump, in the city of New Alamein. This parallel track of diplomacy suggests that the United States is actively cooordinating with Egypt to ensure that all regional actors fulfill their obligations under the Gaza agreement.

President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi emphasized to Jared Kushner the necessity of resolving various regional crises to maintain overall stability. The presence of a high-level U.S. adviser in Egypt underscores that the "Trump plan" mentioned by Hamas is not merely a set of goals, but a framework being actively pushed by the U.S. administration to reshape the Palestinian territories.

The dispute over the Sharm el-Sheikh agreement

A central point of contention in the Cairo talks is the allegation that Israel is reneging on its commitments. Hamas explicitly claimed that Israel has abandoned the Sharm el-Sheikh agreement and the roadmap associated with Donald Trump's plan. The report says that Hamas views these actions as a deliberate rejection of the established diplomatic path.

The Hamas delegation further highlighted the treatment of Palestinian prisoners as a critical failure of the peace process.. By describing Israel's policies toward prisoners as "dangerous" and "destructive," Hamas is attempting to internationalize the issue, calling for regional and international intervention to force Israeli compliance with the agreed-upon terms.

The missing details of the Gaza roadmap

Despite the frequent mentions of a "roadmap" and "Trump's plan," the specific operational details of these documents remain opaque. It is currently unknown what concrete benchmarks constitute "adherence" to the roadmap, or what specific triggers would lead to the start of the reconstruction phase mentioned by Hamas.

Furthermore,the source provides only the Hamas perspective regarding the violations of the Sharm el-Sheikh agreement; there is no corresponding statement from the Israeli government to verify or refute these claims. Without a bilateral confirmation of the terms, the "roadmap" remains a point of contention rather than a shared guide for peace.